Git vs Mercurial
All fine and well, but which to choose? I've used CVS for my personal projects for years, and been planning to move to svn for ages. Is it worth going with svn? I figure if I'm going to make the jump, I may as well make it a big jump. The choice between Git and Mercurial seems to boil down to 'fast, finicky and poorly documented' versus 'slow but predictable and well-documented'. I can see benefit to both, which makes me think that a worthwhile approach would be to see what works best with Eclipse (since that's what I do most of my coding in.)
StackOverflow rocks, as always.
{2010.02.26 17:34}
rss feed